top of page

The Line between Cruelty and Torture

Ireland v United Kingdom [1978]

The Government of the Republic of Ireland claimed that these methods infringed Article 5 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). They also claimed that the practices amounted to torture in violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the ECHR. The Court held that although the 5 techniques amounted to a practice of “inhuman and degrading treatment", which practice was in breach of Article 3, “they did not occasion suffering of the particular intensity and cruelty implied by the word torture”. In 2014, upon uncovering more evidence, the Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade sought to revise the Court’s judgment. The request for revision was dismissed by the Court in 2018.

Written by: Aathira Prakash Menon, 4th Year LLB Student at the University of Edinburgh, Intern at S. Bhambri and Associates.

7 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

I. BACKGROUND The advancement of internet trend has caused a shift in the business sector. Many business organisations have migrated to the internet realm of marketing and commerce, inc

Introduction Black’s law dictionary defines Double Jeopardy as: – A second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense. In India, protection against double jeopardy could be an elementary rig

INTRODUCTION Indian Parliament, in the preceding year passed three bills related to agriculture and farming, together known as the Farmers Bill. The Bills include The Farmer’s Produce Trade and Commer

bottom of page